<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:07:45 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>News Articles on Mitt Romney</title><subtitle>News Articles on Mitt Romney</subtitle><id>http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-01-25T02:15:25Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Romney Distances Himself From Obamacare--Is It Possible When He Approved?</title><category term="heritage foundation"/><category term="mitt romney"/><category term="obamacare"/><category term="romneycare"/><id>http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/2012/1/23/romney-distances-himself-from-obamacare-is-it-possible-when.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/2012/1/23/romney-distances-himself-from-obamacare-is-it-possible-when.html"/><author><name>City On A Hill</name></author><published>2012-01-23T09:58:53Z</published><updated>2012-01-23T09:58:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>In this election cycle Obamacare's foundation is being removed from Romney's resume showcasing&nbsp; his leadership...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Heritage Foundation President, Ed Feulner, posted a <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/30/heritage-president-ed-feulner-responds-to-president-obama%E2%80%99s-claims/#more-30173" target="_blank">blog item</a><em>that same day</em> to protest "this misuse of our work and abuse of our name." He wrote,  "True exchanges are simply a market mechanism to enable families to  choose their health insurance. President Obama's exchanges, by contrast,  are a vehicle to introduce sweeping regulation." But under Romneycare,  as under Obamacare, government sets <a href="https://www.mahealthconnector.org/portal/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/Health%2520Care%2520Reform/Regulations/documents/956%2520CMR%25205.00%2520Final.pdf" target="_blank">minimum standards</a> (i.e., creates regulations) concerning what health insurers may cover. ﻿&nbsp; <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2010/04/author_author.html">For more</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Mitt Romney Responsible For Same-Sex Marriages In Massachusetts</title><category term="defense of marriage act"/><category term="mnitt romney"/><category term="same sex marriage"/><id>http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/2012/1/23/mitt-romney-responsible-for-same-sex-marriages-in-massachuse.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cityonahill.tv/news-articles-on-mitt-romney/2012/1/23/mitt-romney-responsible-for-same-sex-marriages-in-massachuse.html"/><author><name>City On A Hill</name></author><published>2012-01-23T09:26:36Z</published><updated>2012-01-23T09:26:36Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marriage/romney/﻿">Same-sex "marriage" is still NOT legal in Massachusetts, and was NOT created by the Supreme Judicial Court's Goodridge ruling.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"In fact, it was Governor Mitt Romney who was ultimately responsible  for same-sex "marriages" taking place.  The Supreme Judicial Court only  issued an opinion and advised the Legislature to act (which it never  did).  Even the Court acknowledged that it had no power to change the  law.</p>
<p>Governor Romney created these "marriages" through an unconstitutional  and illegal directive to his Department of Public Health (to print new  "marriage" licenses), and through his legal counsel threatened to fire  any Town Clerk or Justice of the Peace who failed to implement the  (non-existent) "new law".  He was not required by any constitutional  mandate to do these things. On the contrary, his actions clearly  violated his oath to uphold the laws of Massachusetts." <a href="http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marriage/romney/﻿">Read more</a>...</p>]]></content></entry></feed>